En anden måde at se på

8 Responses to En anden måde at se på

1. Scott Thomas Photography says:

   14 January 2010 at 16:37

   I like it!

   Reply
   • Carsten says:

     14 January 2010 at 17:11

     Thanks Scott. I have worked on it before. Maybe it is finished now?

     Reply
     • Scott Thomas Photography says:

       20 January 2010 at 18:54

       Only you can tell if it is “finished”.

       BTW, just posted a new assignment on my blog today if you are interested. Of course, anyone else is welcome, too!

       Reply
       • Carsten says:

         24 January 2010 at 21:42

         Thanks for comment Scott.
         I’ll see if I can get inspired to the ‘White’ assignment.

         Reply
2. Gerry says:

   15 January 2010 at 5:04

   The first thought that came into my head was “The fence isn’t high enough to keep it in!” My tendency to invest inanimate objects with powers and intentions is getting out of hand.

   The second thought was that I wish I understood Danish, because the way the title translated into English opened a number of possible interpretations. I wondered if that ambiguity existed in Danish, too. Or a different ambiguity.

   I wonder why I can’t simply look, and say “I like it!” but must bury it in a blizzard of words. I think I’m the guy in the green sweater. He’s wondering, too.

   Reply
   • Carsten says:

     24 January 2010 at 21:47

     I have not seen a fence lately without thinking of you Gerry.
     The words were chosen with ambiguity in mind. I wish my english were better
     The verb look can be ‘seen’ from both sides.

     Reply
     • Gerry says:

       25 January 2010 at 4:36

       Your English is a WHOLE lot better than my Danish! And I like ambiguity, any way you look at it.

       Reply
       • Carsten says:

         25 January 2010 at 10:31

         You’re probably right. I suppose you didn’t have Danish in school for 8 years.

         Reply